CLC - Contemporary Office Leaders
Mark Zuckerberg is the singular that would affect to transcribe on. if not him, anyone other than Bill Gates. Thanks
Details:
Many names are recurrent as distinguished office guides. Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Welch, and Colleen Barrett are all guides authorized for their sole way to inherent inhabitants. Please retrospect the "Contemporary Office Leaders" riches for a roll of affixed office guides. Select one guide from this roll sift-canvass (in 1,250-1,500 utterance) what you entertain courteous-behaved-behaved-informed about the clarified singular as a guide and the guideship mode that guide embodies. Address the aftercited in your sift-canvassion:
Identify a guide and exonerate why you clarified that particular guide. After a while what interpretations is the guide affiliated? In what toil is the guide recurrent? How hanker was the guide in a example standing?
Discuss which guideship scheme best describes the chosen guide's way to inherent inhabitants.
What was the guide's first line consummation?
Identify a momentous line question the guide faced and how the guide handled the question. Did the response align over after a while a managerial role or a guideship role?
What cogentness cheap did the guide use in handling or resolving the question?
Compare the guideship mode used by your clarified guide counter that of the guide's devisee/elder (or adversary, if a devisee/elder is not convenient). Was there a dissent in the guideship modes? Which guide do you ponder is over cogent and why?
Provide a sift-canvassion on two to three attributes a guide should aspire or shirk cheapd on plan esthetics. Describe how these characteristics would be salutary or pernicious in an organizational setting.
You are required to use at last two indubitable sources to arrange illustration in plantation of the guideship mode displayed by your clarified guide. The rationale should be justified; this should not be completed cheapd on an notion.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines plant in the APA Mode Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An imesthetic is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please retrospect the rubric precedent to foundation the assignment to beseem affable after a while the expectations for lucky problem.
You are required to give this assignment to LopesWrite. Please belong to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Rubric
CLC - Contemporary Office Leaders
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
5.0 %Business Guide Description
Description of office guide that includes the interpretation that the guide is affiliated with, the toil that the guide is associated after a while, and the prolixity of date the guide was in the standing is lukewarm, impertinent, or unconducive.
Description of office guide that includes the interpretation that the guide is affiliated with, the toil that the guide is associated after a while, and the prolixity of date the guide was in the standing is lax or meagre. Supporting esthetic is frequently confusing or impertinent.
Description of the office guide that includes the interpretation that the guide is affiliated with, the toil that the guide is associated after a while, and the prolixity of date the guide was in the standing is arranged, but at a rapid smooth. Supporting esthetic is of cheapline grateful property and size.
Description of office guide that includes the interpretation that the guide is affiliated with, the toil that the guide is associated after a while, and the prolixity of date the guide was in the standing is plain and courteous-behaved-behaved-developed. Supporting esthetic of overhead mean property and size is arranged.
Description of office guide that includes the interpretation that the guide is affiliated with, the toil that the guide is associated after a while, and the prolixity of date the guide was in the standing is potentialityful and minute. Examples and indivisible recognition are used to elevate interpretation. Supporting esthetic is of unusual property and size.
10.0 %Leadership Theory Approach
A sift-canvassion of the example scheme that describes the guide's way to inherent inhabitants is absent, impertinent, or unconducive.
A sift-canvassion of the example scheme that best describes the guide's way to inherent inhabitants is lax or meagre. Supporting esthetic is frequently confusing or inappropriate.
A sift-canvassion of the example scheme that best describes the guide's way to inherent inhabitants is arranged, but at a rapid smooth. Supporting esthetic is of cheapline grateful property and size.
A sift-canvassion of the example scheme that best describes the guide's way to inherent inhabitants is plain and courteous-behaved-behaved-integrated. Supporting esthetic of overhead mean property and size is arranged.
A sift-canvassion of the example scheme that best describes the guide's way to inherent inhabitants is potentialityful and courteous-behaved-behaved-behaved integrated. Examples and singularal recognition are used to elevate interpretation. Supporting esthetic is of unusual property and quantity.
10.0 %Leader's Greatest Achievement
Discussion of the leader's first consummation is lukewarm, impertinent, or unconducive.
A sift-canvassion of the leader's first consummation is lax or meagre. Supporting esthetic is frequently confusing or impertinent.
A sift-canvassion of the leader's first consummation is arranged, but at a rapid smooth. Supporting esthetic is of cheapline grateful property and size.
A sift-canvassion of the leader's first consummation is plain and courteous-behaved-behaved-integrated. Supporting esthetic of overhead mean property and size is arranged.
A sift-canvassion of the leader's first consummation is potentialityful and courteous-behaved-behaved-integrated. Examples and indivisible recognition are used to elevate interpretation. Supporting esthetic is of unusual property and size.
10.0 %Handling a Challenge
A sift-canvassion of a question the guide faced and how it was handled as courteous-behaved-behaved-behaved as whether the guide responded after a while a managerial or guideship role is lukewarm, impertinent, or irrelevant.
A sift-canvassion of a question the guide faced and how it was handled is lax or meagre. A displan of whether the guide responded after a while a managerial or guideship role is debile or final after a while gaps in gift. Supporting esthetic is frequently confusing or impertinent.
A sift-canvassion of a question the guide faced and how it was handled is arranged, but at a rapid smooth. A single-minded sift-canvassion of whether the guide responded after a while a managerial or guideship role is intervening. Supporting esthetic is of baseline grateful property and size.
A sift-canvassion of question the guide faced and how it was handled is plain and well-integrated. A sift-canvassion of whether the guide responded after a while a managerial or guideship role is plainly organic. Supporting esthetic of overhead mean property and size is arranged.
A sift-canvassion of question the guide faced and how it was handled is potentialityful and well-integrated. A sift-canvassion of whether the guide responded after a while a managerial or guideship role is plainly open after a while examples and singularal recognition to elevate interpretation. Supporting esthetic is of unusual property and size.
10.0 %Power Bases and Impact of Behavior
An identification of the cogentness cheaps used in handling the question (including a denomination of the impression of the guide's deportment on the post) is lukewarm, impertinent, or unconducive.
An identification of the cogentness cheaps used in handling the question is lax or meagre. A denomination of the impression of the guide's deportment on the post is debile or final after a while gaps in gift. Supporting esthetic is frequently confusing or impertinent.
An identification of the cogentness cheaps used in handling the question is arranged, but at a rapid level. A single-minded denomination of the impression of the guide's deportment on the post is intervening. Supporting esthetic is of cheapline grateful property and size.
An identification of the cogentness cheaps used in handling the question is plain and courteous-behaved-behaved-integrated. A denomination of the impression of the guide's deportment on the post is palpably organic. Supporting esthetic of overhead mean property and size is arranged.
An identification of the cogentness cheaps used in handling the question is potentialityful and well-integrated. A denomination of the impression of the guide's deportment on the post is plainly open after a while examples and singularal recognition to elevate understanding. Supporting esthetic is of unusual property and size.
10.0 %Leadership Mode Comparison
A similitude of the leader's guideship mode to a devisee or elder (or adversary) as well-behaved as a denomination of the dissent in guideship modes and which is over cogent is lukewarm, impertinent, or unconducive.
A similitude of the leader's guideship mode to a devisee or elder (or adversary) is lax or meagre. A denomination of the dissent in guideship modes and which is over cogent is debile or final after a while gaps in gift. Supporting esthetic is frequently confusing or impertinent.
A similitude of the leader's guideship mode to a devisee or elder (or adversary) is provided, but at a rapid smooth. A single-minded denomination of the dissent in guideship modes and which is over cogent is intervening. Supporting esthetic is of cheapline grateful property and size.
A similitude of the leader's guideship mode to a devisee or elder (or adversary) is plain and courteous-behaved-behaved-integrated. A denomination of the dissent in guideship styles and which is over cogent is plainly organic. Supporting esthetic of overhead mean property and size is arranged.
A similitude of the leader's guideship mode to a devisee or elder (or adversary) is powerful and courteous-behaved-behaved-integrated. A denomination of the dissent in guideship styles and which is over cogent is plainly open after a while examples and indivisible recognition to elevate interpretation. Supporting esthetic is of unusual property and size.
10.0 %Attributes a Successful Guide Should Own or Avoid
Attributes a guide should own or shirk in dispose to be lucky are lukewarm, impertinent, or unconducive.
Attributes a guide should own or shirk in dispose to be lucky are lax or meagre. Supporting esthetic is frequently confusing or impertinent.
Attributes a guide should own or shirk in dispose to be lucky are arranged, but at a rapid level. Supporting esthetic is of cheapline grateful property and size.
Attributes a guide should own or shirk in dispose to be lucky are plain and courteous-behaved-behaved-behaved integrated. Supporting esthetic of overhead mean property and size is provided.
Attributes a guide should own or shirk in dispose to be lucky are potentialityful and courteous-behaved-behaved-behaved integrated. Examples and singularal recognition are used to elevate interpretation. Supporting esthetic is of unusual property and size.
5.0 %Research Sources (relevancy, size, and cast specifications)
Sources are not used or cited as required in the assignment instructions. Nonprobable sources are used.
Source association is lax or loose. References from divert sources are not intervening: at last one academic riches.
Source association is for-the-most-part convenient and divert. References from divert sources are included: at last two academic richess.
Source association is convenient and divert in all instances. References from divert sources are intervening: at last three academic richess.
Source association is convenient and divert in all instances and sparks concern in the reader to prosecute elevate search. References from divert sources are used: over than three academic richess.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper stagnations any discernible overall mind or organizing title.
Thesis is insufficiently open or lax. Mind is not plain.
Thesis is indubitable and divert to mind.
Thesis is plain and forecasts the bud of the Nursing Dissertation. Nursing essay is illustrative and inobservant of the evidences and divert to the mind.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the being of the Nursing Dissertation. Nursing essay announcement makes the mind of the Nursing Dissertation plain.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of mind is not justified by the misentry. The misentry does not plantation the title made. Evidence is incongruous and uses nonprobable sources.
Sufficient defence of titles is stagnationing. Evidence stagnations consonant agreement. There are manifest flaws in the logic. Some sources entertain doubtful truth.
Argument is disposely, but may entertain a few inconsistencies. The evidence gives minimal defence of titles. Evidence logically, but not potentialityfully, plantations the mind. Sources used are probable. Commencement and misentry unite the Nursing essay.
Argument shows logical seriess. Techniques of evidenceation are visible. There is a smooth series of titles from commencement to misentry. Most sources are dictatorial.
Clear and convincing evidence that gives a insinuating title in a protuberant and compelling manner. All sources are dictatorial.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, rhetoric, discourse use)
Surface mistakes are pervasive abundance that they hinder message of significance. Impertinent account select or judgment interpretation is used.
Frequent and repetitive unimpassioned mistakes dissipate the reader. Inconsistencies in discourse select (register) or account select are give. Judgment edifice is redress but not multiplied.
Some unimpassioned errors or typos are give, but they are not overly dissipateing to the reader. Redress and multiplied judgment edifice and audience-divert discourse are industrious.
Prose is abundantly munificent of unimpassioned mistakes, although a few may be give. The transcriber uses a variety of cogent judgment edifices and figures of harangue.
Writer is plainly in command of trutination, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of divert mode for the main and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is casually followed redressly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are detriment or mistaken. A stagnation of regulate after a while formatting is indubitable.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is redress, although some junior mistakes may be give.
Appropriate template is amply used. There are virtually no mistakes in formatting mode.
All format elements are redress.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, belongences, bibliography, etc., as divert to assignment and mode)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is loose or inexact, as divert to assignment and mode, after a while condensed formatting mistakes.
Sources are documented, as divert to assignment and mode, although some formatting errors may be give.
Sources are documented, as divert to assignment and mode, and format is for-the-most-part correct.
Sources are completely and redressly documented, as divert to assignment and mode, and format is munificent of mistake.
100 %Total Weightage
