The benefits of receiving a peer review are obvious. What benefit does the peer reviewer gain…

Resources: Giving Constructive Feedback tutorial and Appendix G
· Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum]
· Review the Giving Constructive Feedback tutorial at
http://corptrain.phoenix.edu/AXIA/CRT205/constructive_feedback.html.
· Perform a peer review of a classmate’s rough draft, which your instructor will place in
your Individual forum on Day 4. Fill in each block of the Peer Review Checklist in
Appendix G.
· Post the completed Peer Review Checklist as an attachment.
· Answer the following questions: The benefits of receiving a peer review are obvious.
What benefit does the peer reviewer gain from this activity? What are some drawbacks to
peer reviewing? What other methods can you use to provide effective peer feedback?
· Retain the Peer Review Checklist you receive from your reviewer to submit with your
final paper.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
The benefits of receiving a peer review are obvious. What benefit does the peer reviewer gain…
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Document Preview:

Axia College Material
Appendix G

Peer Review Checklist*

What is the main point of this paper?

What is the greatest strength of this paper?

What material does not seem to fit the main point of the paper or does not seem to be appropriate for the audience?

Has the author sufficiently addressed counterarguments? Explain your answer.

Where should the author add more details or examples? Explain your answer.

Where is the writing unclear or vague?

What is your favorite part of this piece of writing?

What other comments can you provide for the author?

*Adapted from Reinking, J. A., Hart, A. W., & Von der Osten, R. (2003). Strategies for successful writing: A rhetoric, research guide, reader, and handbook (6th ed.). Boston: Prentice-Hall/Pearson Custom Publishing.

ENG 102

Axia College Material
Appendix G

Peer Review Checklist*

What is the main point of this paper?

What is the greatest strength of this paper?

What material does not seem to fit the main point of the paper or does not seem to be appropriate for the audience?

Has the author sufficiently addressed counterarguments? Explain your answer.

Where should the author add more details or examples? Explain your answer.

Where is the writing unclear or vague?

What is your favorite part of this piece of writing?

What other comments can you provide for the author?

*Adapted from Reinking, J. A., Hart, A. W., & Von der Osten, R. (2003). Strategies for successful writing: A rhetoric, research guide, reader, and handbook (6th ed.). Boston: Prentice-Hall/Pearson Custom Publishing.

ENG 102

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

*