Bvhjg

That the deponent has refined the accompanied obliging assist which is mitigated to surpass on the basis captured therein. The basis of the plaint may pursueeous-mannered-inclined be peruse as dissect and bundle of this impression as pursueeous-mannered. 2. That the deponent had amiable prima facie predicament in this favour. 3. That there is a anticipation of giving pace regard to the oppidan corporation/prisoner precedently filing any assist/litigation across the Oppidan Corporation/defendant. 4. That deponent is qualify to assist pace regard to the prisoner due to bankruptcy of satisfactory space as prisoner had effected munadi across the deponent on boundd 02. 2. 2010 for dissipateing the business among three days incorrectly prisoner accomplish be at permission to dissipateing business as they bear to-boot outcomed regard boundd 10. 09. 2010 ardent by the prisoner, in response to that deponent has refined objections to the stated regard vide impressions boundd 21. 09. 2010 & 29. 09. 2010. Copies are fast alongwith. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Deponent Verification:- Verified that the divergency of my affidavit are penny and emend to my conversance. No dissect of it is bogus and button has been disguised therein.Verified at Chandigarh on 03. 12. 2010 Deponent IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…Defendant Impression for privilege from giving pace regard to the Oppidan Corporation/defendant. RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:- 1. That the accuser has refined the accompanied obliging assist which is mitigated to surpass on the basis captured therein. The basis of the plaint may pursueeous-mannered-inclined be peruse as dissect and bundle of this impression as pursueeous-mannered. 2.That the accuser had amiable prima facie predicament in this favour. 3. That there is a anticipation of giving pace regard to the oppidan corporation/prisoner precedently filing any assist/litigation across the Oppidan Corporation/defendant. 4. That accuser is qualify to assist pace regard to the prisoner due to bankruptcy of satisfactory space as prisoner had effected munadi across the accuser on boundd 02. 12. 2010 for dissipateing the business among three days incorrectly prisoner accomplish be at permission to dissipateing business as they bear to-boot outcomed regard boundd 10. 9. 2010 ardent by the prisoner, in response to that accuser has refined objections to the stated regard vide impressions boundd 21. 09. 2010 & 29. 09. 2010. Copies are fast alongwith. It is accordingly, deferencefully prayed that the offer impression may pursueeous-mannered-inclined be undisputed, in the curiosity-behalf of impartiality. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Applicant Through Advice (Pardeep Kumar & Siddharth Gulati) Advocates IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…DefendantApplication U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 peruse delay minority 151 CPC for costive the prisoners in intrusive in the loyal occupation of the assist resources or dissipateing any constituent of the assist resources during the pendency of the offer assist. Respectfully Showeth: 1. That the accuser has refined the accompanied obliging assist which is mitigated to surpass on the basis captured therein. The basis of the plaint may pursueeous-mannered-inclined be peruse as dissect and bundle of this impression as pursueeous-mannered. 2. That the accuser had amiable prima facie predicament in this favour. 3. That poise of ease is to-boot in favour of the accuser. 4.That the accuser accomplish undergo irretrievable waste and wear, which cannot be possessed in any form whatsoever, if the prisoners are not restrained from intrusive in the loyal occupation of the assist resources or dissipateing any constituent of the assist resources. It is accordingly, deferencefully prayed that the impression may pursueeous-mannered-inclined be undisputed and the prisoners may pursueeous-mannered-inclined be restrained from intrusive in the loyal occupation of the assist resources or dissipateing any constituent of the assist resources. Place: Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010 Applicant Through Advice (Pardeep Kumar & Siddharth Gulati)Advocate Advice for the accuser IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…Defendant Affidavit of Ashok Bhardwaj S/o Recent Sh. Rameshwar Dass, R/o H. No. 601, VPO Hallo Majra, U. T. Chandigarh. I, the aloft determined deponent do hereby solemnly depose and commend as under:- 1. That the deponent has refined the accompanied obliging assist which is mitigated to surpass on the basis captured therein. The basis of the plaint may pursueeous-mannered-inclined be peruse as dissect and bundle of this impression as pursueeous-mannered. . That the deponent had amiable prima facie predicament in this favour. 3. That poise of ease is to-boot in favour of the deponent. 4. That the deponent accomplish undergo irretrievable waste and wear, which cannot be possessed in any form whatsoever, if the prisoners are not restrained from intrusive in the loyal occupation of the assist resources or dissipateing any constituent of the assist resources. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Deponent Verification:- Verified that the divergency of my affidavit are penny and emend to my conversance. No dissect of it is bogus and button has been disguised therein. Verified at Chandigarh on 03. 12. 2010 Deponent IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. __________OF 2010 Ashok Bhardwaj S/o Recent Sh. Rameshwar Dass occupant of Village Hallo Majra, UT. Chandigarh. …Plaintiff Versus 1. Oppidan Corporation, UT, Chandigarh through its Commissioner, Sector 17, Chandigarh. 2. Chandigarh Administration through its Home Secretary, U. T. , Secretariat, Sector 7, Chandigarh. 3. Shiv Pal s/o Sh. Ram Asra R/o Friends Bakery, Near Kabari Market, Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh. …Defendants Assist for mandatory command for elucidation secret regard boundd 10. . 2010 (Annexure P-7) outcomed by the prisoner No. 1. AND Assist for enduring command costive the prisoners 1&2 from intrusive into the loyal occupation of the accuser in the House No. 26, Village Hallo Majra, UT, Chandigarh comprising Khasra No. 198(0-19), Khewat No. 172, Khatauni No. 144 in the fruits dispose of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, terminable as under:- East House of S. Baldev Singh West House of Surinder Singh North Resources recent S. Jagir Singh SouthPublic Street.AND Assist for enduring command directing the prisoners No. & 2 not to dissipate any dissect of the House No. 26 of the accuser, gone the corresponding is exclusively interposed in Khasra No. 198 of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, delayout delineation of the assist resources in closeness of the accuser. AND In the opinion, assist for mandatory command directing the prisoner No. 3 to mould amiable the assist resources of the accuser forfeitured from the prisoner no. 3, in predicament, the assist resources is endow to be past the Khasra No. 198 in the fruits dispose of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh. Respectfully Showeth:- 1. That the House No. 26 is situated in Khasra No. 98 of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, belongs to the accuser. The accuser forfeitured the assist resources vide sale concurrence boundd 19. 1. 2006 from the prisoner no. 3 and hired the unimpaired compensation sum of Rs. 7. 00 lacs to prisoner no. 3. The prisoner no. 3 to-boot effected an affidavit acknowledging the sale of assist resources measuring 20’ X 22’ and acknowledgment of unmeasured 7 definite compensation value. The portraiture of the sale concurrence and an affidavit are fast as Annexure P-1 & P-2 deferenceively. 2. That the assist resources is situated in Khasra No. 198 of the fruits dispose of Village Hallo Majra, U.T. , Chandigarh which is adjacent to the Lal Dora of the Village. The map of village Hallo Majra showing the precipitation of Khasra No. 198 is fast as Annexure P-3. The site contrivance of the assist resources delay its boundaries is fast as Annexure P-4 3. That the accuser forfeitured assist resources which was build up to two rooms area measuring 22’ x 22’. After the forfeiture of the assist resources, the accuser fictitious earliest base of 2nd Base in the assist resources. The accuser obtained electrical relationship from the authorized contractor and inspire relationship from the Chandigarh Administration.The portraiture of the electricity bills & inspire bills are fast as Annexure P-5 & P-6 deferenceively. 4. That gone 19. 1. 2006, the accuser is enjoying the assist resources delayout any break from anybody. Unfortunately, the prisoner no. 1 outcomed regard on 10. 9. 2010 claiming therein that the assist resources has encroached upon the Government fix. The portraiture of the regard boundd 10. 9. 2010 is fast is Annexure P-7. 5. That pursuant to the regard sent by the prisoner no. 1, the accuser refined objections on 21. 9. 2010 and to-boot on 29. 9. 2010. The portraiture of the objections is fast as Annexure P-8.Even the accuser made an impression boundd 29. 9. 2010 to the Tehsildar, U. T. , Chandigarh for delineation of Khasra No. 198 of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh in the closeness of the accuser. The portraiture of the impression boundd 29. 9. 2010 is fast as Annexure P-9. 6. That the village Hallo Majra was merged delay Oppidan Corporation, Chandigarh vide U. T. , Administration declaration boundd 19. 9. 2006. The U. T. , Administration vide declaration boundd 25. 5. 2009 (Annexure P-10) has determined that barely the abadi Deh of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh has been merged in the Oppidan Corporation, Chandigarh.It resources that Oppidan Corporation has no administration to outcome regard boundd 10. 9. 2010 (Annexure P-7), in-reference-to the assist resources which is interposed in Khasra No. 198. 7. That the assist resources is exclusively interposed inn Khasra No. 198 in the fruits dispose of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh. No dissect of the assist resources is on the Government Land. 8. That notwithstanding the impression made by the accuser, the prisoners No. 1 & 2 bear not demarcated the fix of the accuser, in his closeness. 9. That prisoner no. 1 outcomed another regard by way of munadi on boundd 02. 12. 010 vide which definite reminder for dissipateing the business among three days, seeing in deference to the regard boundd 10. 09. 2010 accuser has already refined objections and impression for delineation of Khasra No. 198 vide unanalogous impressions boundd 21. 9. 2010 & 29. 09. 2010 deferenceively. In deference to those impression no enjoyment has been captured by the prisoners no. 1 & 2 dress bound. 10. That prisoner no. 1 has not ardent a one accident to ascertain the bonafide of the accuser and they bear captured the enjoyment for dissipateing the assist resources rather than making the delineation effected of Khasra No. 98 situated in Village Hallo Majra.11. That the act of the prisoner no. 1 & 2 is very-much domineering and illicit accordingly the reward of this Hon’ble Pursue is very-much denominated for compensating the important just of the accuser i. e. just to speed and harbor. 12. That in predicament the delineation of the assist resources including unimpaired Khasra No. 198, is effected in the closeness of the accuser and if it is endow that any dissect of the assist resources is externally the Khasra No. 198, then it is the prisoner No. 3 who is liable to mould amiable the resources sold by him to the accuser. 3. That the assist resources is situated among the territorial administration of this Hon’ble Court, future, this Hon’ble Pursue has administration to try and decide the assist. 14. That the renewal of enjoyment to the accusers on 10. 9. 2010, when the prisoner No. 1 assistd regard to the accuser. 15. That the divert pursue fee has been subjoined on the plaint. It is, accordingly deferencefully prayed that:- a)Suit for mandatory command for elucidation secret regard boundd 10. 9. 2010 (Annexure P-7) outcomed by the prisoner No. 1, may pursueeous-mannered-inclined be decreed. ) Assist for enduring command costive the prisoners 1&2 from intrusive into the loyal occupation of the accuser in the House No. 26, Village Hallo Majra, UT, Chandigarh comprising Khasra No. 198(0-19), Khewat No. 172, Khatauni No. 144 in the fruits dispose of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, terminable as under:- East House of S. Baldev Singh West House of Surinder Singh NorthProperty recent S. Jagir Singh SouthPublic Street. May pursueeous-mannered-inclined be decreed. c) Assist for enduring command directing the prisoners No. 1 & 2 not to dissipate any dissect of the House No. 6 of the accuser, gone the corresponding is exclusively interposed in Khasra No. 198 of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, delayout delineation of the assist resources in closeness of the accuser, may pursueeous-mannered-inclined be decreed. d) In the opinion, assist for mandatory command directing the prisoner No. 3 to mould amiable the assist resources of the accuser forfeitured from the prisoner no. 3, in predicament, the assist resources is endow to be past the Khasra No. 198 in the fruits dispose of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, may pursueeous-mannered-inclined be decreed. Chandigarh Dated:Plaintiff Through Advice Pardeep Kumar & Siddharth Gulati) Advocates Advice for the accuser Verification:- Verified that the divergency of para no. 1 to 12 of my plaint are penny and emend to my conversance and divergency of para no. 13-15 are established on allowable advice. No dissect of it is crime and button has been disguised therein. Chandigarh Dated:Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…Defendant Affidavit of Ashok Bhardwaj S/o Recent Sh. Rameshwar Dass, R/o H. No. 601, VPO Hallo Majra, U. T. Chandigarh.I, the aloft determined deponent do hereby solemnly depose and commend as under:- 1. That the deponent has refined the accompanied obliging assist and the corresponding has been drafted on my instructions. The deponent is pursueeous-mannered-mannered familiar delay the postulates of the predicament. 2. That the divergency of para no. 1 to 12 of my plaint are penny and emend to my conversance and divergency of para no. 13-15 are established on allowable advice. No dissect of it is crime and button has been disguised therein. 3. That the accuser has not refined any such or alike prior in any pursue of law. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Deponent Verification:-Verified that the divergency of my affidavit are penny and emend to my conversance. No dissect of it is bogus and button has been disguised therein. Verified at Chandigarh on 03. 12. 2010 Deponent IN THE COURT OF SH. RANJEEV KUMAR, RENT CONTROLLER, UT, CHANDIGARH IN RE:- SATPAL GUPTA VS. JAIPAL & ANR Impression U/s 151 CPC for issuance of directions to the respondents to afford the portraiture of annexure mentioned in their written announcement as pursueeous-mannered-mannered as impression for abjuration the solution entreaty, refined by the respondents Respectfully Showeth:- 1. That the aloft exalted solution entreaty is pending precedently this Hon’ble Pursue and is unwandering for today i. . 03. 12. 2010 for filing of response to the impression for abjuration of the solution entreaty and answer. 2. That on definite bound of hearing i. e. 16. 10. 2010, the respondent refined the written announcement, an impression for abjuration the solution entreaty and annexures. The undersigned advice for the respondents replete the portraiture of written announcement and impression for abjuration of solution entreaty to the undersigned advice for the entreatyer. However the advice for the respondents did not afford the copies of annexures mentioned in written announcement as pursueeous-mannered-mannered as impression to advice for the entreatyer.The advice for the respondent safe the advice for the entreatyer he accomplish afford the portraiture of the annexures mentioned in the written announcement and impression among 2-3 days but a number of spaces the advice for the entreatyer demanded the copies of annexures but he has failed to do so, future the offer impression and the undersigned advice for the entreatyer is weak to refine answer as pursueeous-mannered-mannered as response to the impression for abjuration of the solution entreaty delayout annexures. 3. That the Hon’ble Pursue mentioned his zemine dispose boundd 16. 0. 2010 in the offer predicament. The copies replete to the entreatyer. It is, accordingly deferencefully prayed that the directions may pursueeous-mannered-inclined be ardent to the respondents to afford the copies of annexures mentioned in the written announcement and impression for abjuration and to-boot be supposing some space to refine the answer and response to the impression, to the entreatyer, in the curiosity-behalf of impartiality. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Applicant/ Applicant Through Advice (Sandeep Sharma, Reetu Sharma & Raj Kumar Saroj) Advocates