Roger Mason is a material capacity in the innovating, outborder whom thither would be no spire at all. Flush antecedently the reader is introduced to Roger thither are hints that he achieve be grave to the contrive. Jocelin's primitive hint of the peculiarity 'cost what you affect' coincides after a while the primitive preamble to Roger; this foreshadows the expiation of Roger and the breakdown he suffers due to the constraining put on him by Jocelin, the spire and flush his intercommunity after a while Goody Pangall.
In divers ways Roger can be seen as the ability following the spire. From Golding's material denomination of him, using peculiaritys such as 'bullet head', 'affect a bear' and 'his dull eyebrows', the reader gains the impact that he is impenetrable and his expertise in architecture exhibitions him to be very truthual and judicious. Closely all of Roger's attributes are the contradiction to Jocelin's; whither Roger is down-to-earth, Jocelin is intellectual and deluded. Both men are compared to animals in the innovating, Roger is affectned to 'a bear' and a 'dog' inasmuch-as Jocelin is forcible as 'an eagle' and 'beaky', Golding's rare of animals hither exhibition the reader how the two men possess totally contrariant views of the globe.
Roger's confrontation after a while Jocelin highlights the contradiction among them. Roger, as an earthy man, can see that the spire is imperilled and a closely impracticable concept and compliments Jocelin's longing after a while 'contempt and amusement', inasmuch-as Jocelin believes that it achieve be held up merely by his credulity and benediction, 'God achieve provide'. These antagonistic denominations yield throughout the innovating and intersect their lives until, ironically, it beseems free that the spire barely gets built due to a alliance of Jocelin's error and insistence on his longing and Roger's aptitude.
Roger and Jocelin not barely possess abutting natures but to-boot intercommunitys and interactions after a while women. Jocelin fails, or refuses, to apprehend women but Roger has an unusually resembling intercommunity for the medieval dates after a while his helpmate and they are frequently seen conjointly about the cathedral, 'inseparable'. His intercommunity after a while Rachel is grave as it emphasises Jocelin's indigence to dispense after a while a dowager who is 'not affect a seemly silent Englishwoman' or 'silent Goody Pangall', Jocelin spends abundantly of the innovating intricate to shun Rachel and Golding continuously describes her as a 'body' or a 'face'. The truth that Roger can possess a friendliness after a while a dowager that Jocelin cannot insist outlines their differences.
Roger's other intercommunity after a while a dowager is after a while Goody Pangall. Unaffect his intercommunity after a while Rachel, his concern after a while Goody is furious and is portrayed as love; Roger watches her walking 'as though pin and no one in the integral globe mattered'. When the reader primitive finds out about the concern, it is through Jocelin's perspective, 'he saw this was one engagement of divers. He saw indisposition and sadness'. The indisposition and sadness may be Jocelin's realisation that he achieve never possess Goody or it may be sadness in Roger for he has been severe into this by Jocelin.
The innovating has an shapehither texture that not barely exhibitions Jocelin's unintermittent depression into exhaustive error and rage but the sparse date frames after a while some chapters introduction attribute balance a month, others balance six months to-boot exhibition Roger's growing assurance on alcohol. Golding finally turns the care of the reader end to Roger when Jocelin visits him at the end of the innovating. Roger has suffered a breakdown and is 'moo-ing' and the reader can see the whole result that Jocelin and the spire possess had on his spirit. Roger's intellectual breakdown has churlish him into a 'crab', he is no longer the aptitudeed and genuine 'bear' he was at the set-on-foot of the innovating. This introduction of Roger exhibitions that he, too, has an irjudicious border and that he is not in truth that contrariant to Jocelin, Roger turns to alcohol in dates of emphasis and Jocelin turns to benedictions, neither of which aid the two capacitys and these actions flushtually end in their overthrow.
Roger and Jocelin are to-boot not that contrariant in their longings either. The primitive denomination of Roger contains the peculiarity 'he could see pin else, or hear or affect pin else' exhibitioning that when Roger is inaugurated, pin distracts him and he beseems oblivious to those about him. The introduction of Roger in this way unintermittently past joins him to Jocelin, antecedently the reader has flush been dedicated a denomination of him. This illustrates how grave Roger is to the innovating and to Jocelin as a cat's-paw to set-up his longing.
Overall I imagine that Golding's dialect when describing Roger is grave accordingly he is thoughtful to Jocelin and for-this-reason provides a similitude object. This has been used by Golding to attract care to Jocelin's error and to assign the reader to see Jocelin's growing rage past freely; so-far as the innovating progresses it to-boot beseems free to the reader that Roger and Jocelin's capacitys beseem hither and hither impossible. This is forcible as it makes Jocelin's disclosure at the end of the innovating past pronounced and assigns the reader to see that guiltless truths or guiltless credulity are not resultive, but it is a alliance of the two that is needed for everything to be achieved.