DNP: Scientific Underpinnings

Case Report: Contact of Theory In this assignment, learners are required to transcribe a circumstance repute addressing the idiosyncratic enlightenment and skills gained in this continuity and hypothetically solving an attested exerextract bearing. General Guidelines:  Use the forthcoming instruction to fix happy drift of the assignment: · Doctoral learners are required to use APA diction for their match assignments.  · This assignment requires that at meanest two concomitant scholarly learning founts cognate to this question, and at meanest one in-text extract from each fount be comprised. · You are required to succumb this assignment to LopesWrite. Please point to the directions in the Student Success Center. Directions: Construct a 2,500-3,000 expression (closely 10-12 pages) circumstance repute that comprises a bearing or birth congruous after a while a DNP area of exercitation. Requirements: 1. Use a minimum of any two theories discussed in the continuity to unravel the circumstance repute. 2. Apply one or further theories to elucidate brains of the bearing or birth of rendezvous. 3. Apply one or further theories to the recommended agency or key life contemplated. 4. Unravel the circumstance repute resisting the generous scenario from the attested clinical or vigor pains bearing through proposing an agency, implementation, and evaluation using an expend learning machine. 5. Elucidate the evaluation of the clarified learning machine in the circumstance repute. 6. Lastly, elucidate in generous the profession, rationale for preoption (tentative testimony), and unclouded contact using the speech of the plea after a whilein the circumstance repute. In specification, your circumstance repute must comprise the forthcoming: 1. Introduction after a while a bearing proposition. 2. Brief reading criticism. 3. Name of the circumstance/situation/conditions elucidateed from a hypothetical perspective. 4. Discussion that comprises a detailed interpretation of the synthesized reading findings. 5. Summary of the circumstance. 6. Contemplated keys to redress gaps, inefficiencies, or other issues from a hypothetical similarity. 7. Identification of a learning machine to evaluate the contemplated key along after a while a name of how the machine could be evaluated. 8. Conclusion. Study Materials 1. Philosophies and Theories for Advanced Nursing Practice: chapters 6, 15, and 16. a. URL: http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/jones-and-bartlett/2013/philosophies-and-theories-for-advanced-nursing-practice-butts-philosophies-and-theories-for-advanced-nursing-practice_ebook_2e.php 2. Ludwig von Bertalanffy: Passages From General Systems Plea (n.d.). a. This refount provides instruction on Bartalanffy's General Systems Theory. b. URL: http://www.panarchy.org/vonbertalanffy/systems.1968.html 3. Europeanisation, Complexity, and the British Prosperity State a. Geyer, R. (2003, September). Europeanisation, entanglement, and the British prosperity declare. Paper presented to the UACES/ESRC Study Group on The Europeanisation of British Politics and Policy-Making, Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, England. b. URL: http://aei.pitt.edu/1719/1/Geyer.pdf 4. Improving the Virtue of Healthpains and Generally-known Health: A Multiscale Deep Systems Analysis. a. Bar-Yam, Y. (2006). Opportunities and demands in generally-known vigor systems. Improving the virtue of vigor pains and generally-known vigor: A multisite deep systems separation. American Journal of Generally-known Health, 96(3), 459-466. b. URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=2009129456&site=ehost-live&scope=site 5. Chaos Theory a. Chaos plea. (2007). In the Social Science Jargon-Buster. b. URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.credoreference.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/content/entry/sageukssjb/chaos_theory/0 6. Chaos, Complexity, and Nursing a. Walsh, M. (2000). Chaos, entanglement, and nursing. Nursing Standard, 14(32), 39-42. b. URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/219811017?accountid=7374 7. Optional: Organizational Deportment 4: From Plea to Practice a. Miner, J. B. (2007). Organizational deportment 4: From plea to exercitation. [Books24x7 account]. b. URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://library.books24x7.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/library.asp?%5eB&bookid=20745&refid=C3VGQ 8. What Is Systems Theory? a. Heylighan, F., & Joslyn, C.  (1992). What is systems plea? b. URL: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/SYSTHEOR.html 9. Optional: Major Organizational Theories a. Rollag, K. (n.d.). Major organizational theories. [Babson College faculty website]. b. URL:http://faculty.babson.edu/krollag/org_site/org_theory/theory_index/theory_toc.html