DUE 2/25/18 @ 12PM EST

1OO WORD MINIMUM 1.   What is hazardous thinking as it applies to the administration of nefarious integrity? How does the analogy disprevalent ethics, hazardous thinking, and proceeding contact the nefarious integrity plan from an functional convergence? How can we mend the analogy disprevalent these areas among the nefarious integrity plan (law enforcement, courts, and corrections)? 2.      What are the niggardly organizational proceeding concepts occupied by nefarious integrity organizations? How are these organizational proceeding concepts utilized on a daily premise among nefarious integrity settings? Compare and contrariety the criteria needed for these organizational proceeding concepts to be fortunate among the nefarious integrity opportunity. 3.   What is an development of an gone-by/prevalent deviate that has heavily contacted the nefarious integrity environment? How do gone-by, prevalent, and advenient deviates contact the connections delay sociality? What would bechance if these connections were different or past? Explain. 4.  What are the functional standards and values of the nefarious integrity plan? How do these standards and values contact the overall consummation of the nefarious integrity plan as a undivided? How can we mend functional standards and values of the nefarious integrity plan so that they are represented akin state ample? Explain.  5. Read and incorporate "time to Reform" 6. Read and incorporate ''Cyber Crime