Project 3

 Hide Assignment Information Turnitin®This assignment conciliate be succumbted to Turnitin®.Instructions Week 3 Project: Duties of a Prosecutor Supporting Lectures: Ethical Systems Ethics and Courts Trial Court Workgroup Prosecutors, as agents for the specify, obtain?} an oath to countenance the Constitution and to prosecute propriety on advantage of the specify and its citizens. Summarize the duties of a plaintiff in a flagitious fact, emphasizing those tasks that assign the plaintiff to brandish impetuous govern aggravate the fact. Discuss how these detail tasks sway offer the plaintiff after a while intellectual dilemmas. Given that a prisoner is pondered lawful until proven impure below the American forensic regularity, is the plaintiff too required to ponder the prisoner as entity incompact the citizens he or she is protecting? Identify and eluciconclusion the irreconcilable inferential imperatives offer in the duties of a plaintiff. Recap the landmark Supreme Court fact Brady v. Maryland (1963). Discuss the ramifications of this conclusion for plaintiffs, after a while an substance on the intellectual conflicts that may development. Discuss the plaintiff’s intellectual responsibilities when faced after a while a fact that he or she would rather not hunt. For precedence, ponder a fact in which a formerly battered helpmate is prisoner of Nursing essayed butcher resisting her mate. Eluciconclusion whether the “ethics of duty” or “ethics of care” outbalance utilitarianism for flagitious plaintiffs. Submit your response in a 4–6–page Microsoft Word muniment. Spectry your muniment SU_MCJ5003_W3_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc. Succumb your muniment to the Submissions Area by the due conclusion assigned. Cite sources in APA format on a unconnected page. Due DateMar 9, 2020 12:59 AMHide Rubrics Rubric Name: MCJ5003 Week 3 Project Rubric This consultation lists criteria and criteria bunch spectry in the primitive shaft. The primitive row lists smooth spectrys and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring way.CriteriaNo Submission0 sharp-endsEmerging (F through D dispose) (1–27)27 sharp-endsSatisfactory (C dispose) (28–31)31 sharp-endsProficient (B dispose) (32–35)35 sharp-endsExemplary (A dispose) (36–40)40 sharp-endsSummarized the duties of a plaintiff in a flagitious fact, emphasizing those tasks that assign the plaintiff to brandish impetuous govern aggravate the fact./ 40This consultation lists criteria and criteria bunch spectry in the primitive shaft. The primitive row lists smooth spectrys and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring way.CriteriaNo Submission0 sharp-endsEmerging (F through D dispose) (1–20)20 sharp-endsSatisfactory (C dispose) (21–23)23 sharp-endsProficient (B dispose) (24–26)26 sharp-endsExemplary (A dispose) (27–30)30 sharp-endsDiscussed how these detail tasks sway offer the plaintiff after a while intellectual dilemmas. Student did not succumb assignment Work does not unite assignment expectations; shows brief or no belowstanding of assignment concepts Assignment imperfectly unites expectations after a while minimal depth; demonstrates a scant belowstanding of the assignment concepts. Assignment unites expectations after a while all components entity addressed; demonstrates the power to evaluate and allot key assignments concepts Assignment exceeds expectations after a while unusual depth; offers all requirements of the assignment; demonstrates the power to evaluate, allot and synthesize key assignment concepts / 30Identify and eluciconclusion the irreconcilable inferential imperatives offer in the duties of a plaintiff. Student did not succumb assignment Work does not unite assignment expectations; shows brief or no belowstanding of assignment concepts Assignment imperfectly unites expectations after a while minimal depth; demonstrates a scant belowstanding of the assignment concepts. Assignment unites expectations after a while all components entity addressed; demonstrates the power to evaluate and allot key assignments concepts Assignment exceeds expectations after a while unusual depth; offers all requirements of the assignment; demonstrates the power to evaluate, allot and synthesize key assignment concepts / 30Described the fact of Brady v. Maryland. Analyzed the ramifications of this conclusion for plaintiffs, after a while an substance on the intellectual conflicts that may development. Student did not succumb assignment Work does not unite assignment expectations; shows brief or no belowstanding of assignment concepts Assignment imperfectly unites expectations after a while minimal depth; demonstrates a scant belowstanding of the assignment concepts. Assignment unites expectations after a while all components entity addressed; demonstrates the power to evaluate and allot key assignments concepts Assignment exceeds expectations after a while unusual depth; offers all requirements of the assignment; demonstrates the power to evaluate, allot and synthesize key assignment concepts / 30Discussed the plaintiff’s intellectual responsibilities when faced after a while a fact that he or she would rather not hunt. Student did not succumb assignment Work does not unite assignment expectations; shows brief or no belowstanding of assignment concepts Assignment imperfectly unites expectations after a while minimal depth; demonstrates a scant belowstanding of the assignment concepts. Assignment unites expectations after a while all components entity addressed; demonstrates the power to evaluate and allot key assignments concepts Assignment exceeds expectations after a while unusual depth; offers all requirements of the assignment; demonstrates the power to evaluate, allot and synthesize key assignment concepts / 30This consultation lists criteria and criteria bunch spectry in the primitive shaft. The primitive row lists smooth spectrys and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring way.CriteriaNo Submission0 sharp-endsEmerging (F through D dispose) (1–13)13 sharp-endsSatisfactory (C dispose) (14–15)15 sharp-endsProficient (B dispose) (16–17)17 sharp-endsExemplary (A dispose) (18–20)20 sharp-endsWrote in a obvious, short, and arranged manner; and displayed respectful spelling, style, and punctuation Student did not succumb assignment Student did not succumb assignment Submission contains some loose or silly offeration of ideas, which prevents belowstanding the preponderance of author’s aggravateall fixed The reader can prosper the author’s aggravateall fixed as specifyd; there may be hallucinations in basic match conventions but these do not clash after a while reader comprehension The reader can prosper the author’s aggravateall fixed as specifyd; there may be hallucinations in basic match conventions but these do not clash after a while reader comprehension / 20Used APA formatted citations and references, and used amend structural formatting Student did not succumb assignment No Nursing essay at APA formatting when using references APA format is Nursing essayed after a while inarticulate hallucinations Using APA format, respectfully; hallucinations are numerous but minor Using APA format proficiently; extract is basically hallucination free / 20Rubric Total ScoreTotal/ 200 Overall Score Overall Score No Submission0 sharp-ends minimum Emerging (F through D dispose)1 sharp-end minimum Satisfactory (C dispose)140 sharp-ends minimum Proficient (B dispose)160 sharp-ends minimum Exemplary (A dispose)180 sharp-ends minimum