W8A4

  

*****NEEDS TO BE DONE ON A MASTER’S LEVEL!!!!!

Assignment 4: Entering Assets into the Learning Management System (LMS)

Once your curriculum and assets have been approved by your professor, upload them into CourseSites.com at or Schoology.com at to demonstrate how your material is delivered through an LMS. Note: These are both free sites.

In the LMS, complete the following:

1. Create a course using your curriculum. Note: The course can be short and simple depending on the topic and curriculum of your course. The goal is to test whether the assets work functionally in the LMS.

2. Perform two to three (2-3) tasks (e.g., respond to a discussion question, view a video, etc.) in the course that you are invited to participate.

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

1. Explain the method and process that you used for uploading and maintaining your assets into the LMS (e.g., determining where to place the assets, in what order, etc.). Next, explain how you will document the need for revisions to the course as well as the process you would recommend to keep your course design agile.

2. Examine your experience as an end user in the course in which you were invited to participate. Evaluate whether or not the navigation and display of the learning assets supported your ability to synthesize, analyze, and evaluate the course material. Include at least one (1) example of such experience to support your response.

3. Determine the main constraints of the course in which you were invited to participate. Suggest at least one (1) change that you would make to the menu options and the display in order to improve the user experience. Provide a rationale for your response.

4. Compare and contrast your experience as the person creating the assets in the LMS and your experience as a student in the LMS. Next, discuss on at least one (1) change that you would make in order to improve the learning assets and the display for your own course.

5. Provide at least two (2) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used previously), published within the last five (5) years that support the paper’s claims.

6. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:

a. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.

b. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

c. Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

· Describe reasons for modifying the menu options and display of a Learning Management System (LMS).

· Recognize various roles of users in a Learning Management System (LMS).

· Utilize an LMS to perform tasks and communicate to users.

· Design learning assets based on end user or organizational needs.

· Use technology and information resources to research issues in technology tools to manage learning.

· Write clearly and concisely about issues in technology tools to manage learning using proper writing mechanics.

  

Points: 150

Assignment 4: Entering Assets into the Learning Management   System (LMS)

 

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below   70% F

Fair

70-79%   C

Proficient

80-89%   B

Exemplary

90-100%   A

 

1. Explain the method and process   that you used for uploading and maintaining your assets into the LMS (e.g.,   determining where to place the assets, in what order, etc.). Next, explain   how you will document the need for revisions to the course as well as the   process you would recommend to keep your course design agile.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely   explained the method and process that you used for uploading and maintaining   your assets into the LMS (e.g., determining where to place the assets, in   what order, etc.). Did not submit or incompletely explained how you will   document the need for revisions to the course as well as the process you   would recommend to keep your course design agile.

Partially explained the   method and process that you used for uploading and maintaining your assets   into the LMS (e.g., determining where to place the assets, in what order,   etc.). Partially explained how you will document the need for revisions to   the course as well as the process you would recommend to keep your course   design agile.

Satisfactorily explained the   method and process that you used for uploading and maintaining your assets   into the LMS (e.g., determining where to place the assets, in what order,   etc.). Satisfactorily explained how you will document the need for revisions   to the course as well as the process you would recommend to keep your course   design agile.

Thoroughly explained the   method and process that you used for uploading and maintaining your assets   into the LMS (e.g., determining where to place the assets, in what order,   etc.). Thoroughly explained how you will document the need for revisions   to the course as well as the process you would recommend to keep your course   design agile.

 

2. Examine your experience as an   end user in the course in which you were invited to participate. Evaluate   whether or not the navigation and display of the learning assets supported   your ability to synthesize, analyze, and evaluate the course material. Include   at least one (1) example of such experience to support your response.
  Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely   examined your experience as an end user in the course in which you were   invited to participate. Did not submit or incompletely evaluated whether or   not the navigation and display of the learning assets supported your ability   to synthesize, analyze, and evaluate the course material. Did not submit or   incompletely included at least one (1) example of such experience to support   your response.

Partially examined your experience   as an end user in the course in which you were invited to participate.   Partially evaluated whether or not the navigation and display of the learning   assets supported your ability to synthesize, analyze, and evaluate the course   material. Partially included at least one (1) example of such experience to   support your response.

Satisfactorily examined your   experience as an end user in the course in which you were invited to   participate. Satisfactorily evaluated whether or not the navigation and   display of the learning assets supported your ability to synthesize, analyze,   and evaluate the course material. Satisfactorily included at least one (1)   example of such experience to support your response.

Thoroughly examined your experience   as an end user in the course in which you were invited to participate.   Thoroughly evaluated whether or not the navigation and display of the   learning assets supported your ability to synthesize, analyze, and evaluate   the course material. Thoroughly included at least one (1) example of such   experience to support your response.

 

3. Determine the main constraints   of the course in which you were invited to participate. Suggest at least one   (1) change that you would make to the menu options and the display in order   to improve the user experience. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the   main constraints of the course in which you were invited to participate. Did   not submit or incompletelysuggested at least one (1) change that you would   make to the menu options and the display in order to improve the user   experience. Did not submit or incompletelyprovided a rationale for your   response.

Partially determined the   main constraints of the course in which you were invited to participate.   Partially suggested at least one (1) change that you would make to the menu   options and the display in order to improve the user experience. Partially   provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily determined the   main constraints of the course in which you were invited to participate.   Satisfactorilysuggested at least one (1) change that you would make to the   menu options and the display in order to improve the user experience.   Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly determined the   main constraints of the course in which you were invited to participate.   Thoroughlysuggested at least one (1) change that you would make to the menu   options and the display in order to improve the user experience. Thoroughly   provided a rationale for your response.

 

4. Compare and contrast your   experience as the person creating the assets in the LMS and your experience   as a student in the LMS. Next, discuss on at least one (1) change that you   would make in order to improve the learning assets and the display for your   own course.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely   compared and contrasted your experience as the person creating the assets in   the LMS and your experience as a student in the LMS. Did not submit or   incompletely discussed on at least one (1) change that you would make in   order to improve the learning assets and the display for your own course.

Partially compared and   contrasted your experience as the person creating the assets in the LMS and   your experience as a student in the LMS. Partially discussed on at least one   (1) change that you would make in order to improve the learning assets and   the display for your own course.

Satisfactorily compared and   contrasted your experience as the person creating the assets in the LMS and   your experience as a student in the LMS. Satisfactorily discussed on at least   one (1) change that you would make in order to improve the learning assets   and the display for your own course.

Thoroughly compared and contrasted   your experience as the person creating the assets in the LMS and your   experience as a student in the LMS. Thoroughly discussed on at least one (1)   change that you would make in order to improve the learning assets and the   display for your own course.

 

5. Provide at least two (2)   reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used   previously), published within the last five (5) years that support the   paper’s claims.

Weight: 5%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number   of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required   references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required   references; all references high quality choices.

 

6. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and   Formatting

Weight: 5%

Serious and persistent errors in   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially free of errors in   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly free of errors in grammar,   spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error free or almost error free   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

 

7. Appropriate use of APA in-text   citations and reference section

Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text citations and / or   lack of reference section.

In-text citations and references   are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

Most in-text citations and   references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA   style.

In-text citations and references   are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in   APA style.

 

8. Information Literacy /   Integration of Sources

Weight: 5%

Serious errors in the integration   of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use   in-text citations.

Sources are partially integrated   using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are mostly integrated   using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are consistently   integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and   summarizing.

 

9. Clarity and Coherence of   Writing

Weight: 5%

Information is confusing to the   reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support   ideas.

Information is partially clear   with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is mostly clear and   generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is provided in a   clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that   logically support ideas.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Answers Market
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Education
Thank you so much, Reaserch writer. you are so helpfull. I appreciate all the hard works. See you.
Customer 452701, February 12th, 2023
Political science
I like the way it is organized, summarizes the main point, and compare the two articles. Thank you!
Customer 452701, February 12th, 2023
Psychology
Thank you. I will forward critique once I receive it.
Customer 452467, July 25th, 2020
Business Studies
Great paper thanks!
Customer 452543, January 23rd, 2023
Psychology
I requested a revision and it was returned in less than 24 hours. Great job!
Customer 452467, November 15th, 2020
Technology
Thank you for your work
Customer 452551, October 22nd, 2021
Finance
Thank you very much!! I should definitely pass my class now. I appreciate you!!
Customer 452591, June 18th, 2022
Accounting
Thank you for your help. I made a few minor adjustments to the paper but overall it was good.
Customer 452591, November 11th, 2021
Political science
Thank you!
Customer 452701, February 12th, 2023
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat